<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worthwhile reading&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ideasandimages.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/worthwhile-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ideasandimages.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/worthwhile-reading/</link>
	<description>...examining the threshold at which ordinary visibility ends and perception begins...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:32:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Niebuhr</title>
		<link>http://ideasandimages.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/worthwhile-reading/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Niebuhr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mniebuhr.com/?p=801#comment-105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Hugh, 

Thanks for visiting and thanks for the tip on Wall&#039;s new book.  I&#039;ll   have to check it out.   I have read / browsed through the Fried&#039;s book   a couple of times now and I agree parts of it are baffling still - but   I try not to let that get in the way!  I think the book opened up a   deeper understanding of the work of Thomas Struth as well for me   particularly the museum picture series - I&#039;ve enjoyed seeing some of   Struth&#039;s work back in the Des Moines Art Center where I used to live   and reading something more about the work after seeing it is a good   thing - I try hard to let my own &quot;first impressions&quot; formulate, but I   appreciate it when I find decent criticism that opens up the work   more.  It&#039;s difficult sometimes to find that kind of in-depth writing.   There are times though when it seems that Fried &quot;gets in the way&quot; -   meaning it seems his writing is too concerned about making his   interpretation relevant.  It&#039;s a difficult thing to write in support   of someone else&#039;s hard work with the intent to truly celebrate their   accomplishments and not your own brilliance...  Fried should be   confident enough to be more transparent - when he&#039;s transparent he&#039;s   at his best I think.... 

Thanks again for the note and I look forward to reading your blog too. 

Matt 

Matt Niebuhr www.mattniebuhr.com niebuhr.matt@gmail.com ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hugh, </p>
<p>Thanks for visiting and thanks for the tip on Wall&#8217;s new book.  I&#8217;ll   have to check it out.   I have read / browsed through the Fried&#8217;s book   a couple of times now and I agree parts of it are baffling still &#8211; but   I try not to let that get in the way!  I think the book opened up a   deeper understanding of the work of Thomas Struth as well for me   particularly the museum picture series &#8211; I&#8217;ve enjoyed seeing some of   Struth&#8217;s work back in the Des Moines Art Center where I used to live   and reading something more about the work after seeing it is a good   thing &#8211; I try hard to let my own &#8220;first impressions&#8221; formulate, but I   appreciate it when I find decent criticism that opens up the work   more.  It&#8217;s difficult sometimes to find that kind of in-depth writing.   There are times though when it seems that Fried &#8220;gets in the way&#8221; &#8211;   meaning it seems his writing is too concerned about making his   interpretation relevant.  It&#8217;s a difficult thing to write in support   of someone else&#8217;s hard work with the intent to truly celebrate their   accomplishments and not your own brilliance&#8230;  Fried should be   confident enough to be more transparent &#8211; when he&#8217;s transparent he&#8217;s   at his best I think&#8230;. </p>
<p>Thanks again for the note and I look forward to reading your blog too. </p>
<p>Matt </p>
<p>Matt Niebuhr <a href="http://www.mattniebuhr.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mattniebuhr.com</a> <a href="mailto:niebuhr.matt@gmail.com">niebuhr.matt@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://ideasandimages.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/worthwhile-reading/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mniebuhr.com/?p=801#comment-104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed reading Michael Fried&#039;s book a lot too. I found some of the philosophical digressions about Wittgenstein and so on pretty baffling but it certainly opens up a new way of looking at photographs - in particular the parallels between his work and 18th Century painting. By the way, there is a new book about Jeff Wall published by Phaidon that is superb. It&#039;s good great reproductions of his work, essay by critics, interviews with Wall, and essays by Wall. Highly recommended. Enjoying your blog by the way ....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading Michael Fried&#8217;s book a lot too. I found some of the philosophical digressions about Wittgenstein and so on pretty baffling but it certainly opens up a new way of looking at photographs &#8211; in particular the parallels between his work and 18th Century painting. By the way, there is a new book about Jeff Wall published by Phaidon that is superb. It&#8217;s good great reproductions of his work, essay by critics, interviews with Wall, and essays by Wall. Highly recommended. Enjoying your blog by the way &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

